On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Martin Wilck wrote: > It's a scalable system where multiple boards may be combined. Anyway, I see > nothing in the specs that says you must start counting CPUs from zero. Well, Intel's "Multiprocessor Specification" mandates that (see section 3.6.1 and also the compliance list in Appendix C). I does not mandate local APIC IDs to be consecutive though. Maciej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- References:
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: yhlu <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: yhlu <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- Prev by Date: debug a high load average
- Next by Date: Re: kernel module seg fault
- Previous by thread: Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- Next by thread: Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- Index(es):
