Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Martin Wilck wrote:

> It's a scalable system where multiple boards may be combined. Anyway, I see
> nothing in the specs that says you must start counting CPUs from zero.

 Well, Intel's "Multiprocessor Specification" mandates that (see section 
3.6.1 and also the compliance list in Appendix C).  I does not mandate 
local APIC IDs to be consecutive though.

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
  - From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
  - From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
  - From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
  - From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
  - From: yhlu <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
  - From: yhlu <[email protected]>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
  - From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: debug a high load average
Next by Date: Re: kernel module seg fault
Previous by thread: Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
Next by thread: Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]