So MPTABLE do not have problem with it, only acpi related...?
YH
On 8/12/05, Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:55:40PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > I wrote:
> >
> > >>How so? The XAPIC version check should work there.
> > >
> > >ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x11] lapic_id[0x21] enabled)
> > >Processor #33 15:4 APIC version 16
> > >ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x12] lapic_id[0x26] enabled)
> > >Processor #38 15:4 APIC version 16
> >
> > Forget it. I have fallen prey to this line:
> >
> > processor.mpc_apicver = 0x10; /* TBD: lapic version */
> >
> > in arch/x86_64/kernel/mpparse.c.
> > I am used to get correct answers from Linux :-)
>
> Heh. Should probably fix that. Can you file a bug with the ACPI
> people on http://bugzilla.kernel.org ? (or do a patch?)
>
> -Andi
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |