On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:37:11AM -0700, yhlu wrote: > So MPTABLE do not have problem with it, only acpi related...? It's only a cosmetic problem I think with the printk being wrong. The actual decision in the code should all use the true value. Another way would be to just remove the printk output. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: yhlu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- References:
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@fujitsu-siemens.com>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@fujitsu-siemens.com>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@fujitsu-siemens.com>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- From: yhlu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
- Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- Prev by Date: Re: [discuss] Re: 2.6.13-rc2 with dual way dual core ck804 MB
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix mmap_kmem (was: [question] What's the difference between /dev/kmem and /dev/mem)
- Previous by thread: Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- Next by thread: Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs
- Index(es):
