Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS

* Roman Zippel ([email protected]) wrote:
> What's wrong with a normal dependency?

Trying to enable when SYSFS under fs->pseudo->fs but security is under
security-> is just confusing, with no obvious (user perspective)
dependency.

> Please don't abuse select, use it only if you really have to.

OK, depends will be fine, esp. since it's just effecting CONFIG_EMBEDDED.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: rc5 seemed to kill a disk that rc4-mm1 likes. Also some X trouble.
• Next by Date: thousands of "tulip_stop_rxtx() failed" errors
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS
• Next by thread: [2.6 patch] FB_INTEL must depend on HW_CONSOLE
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]