Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS

Hi,

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote:

> * Adrian Bunk ([email protected]) wrote:
> >  config SECURITY
> >  	bool "Enable different security models"
> > +	depends on SYSFS
> 
> Hmm, what about select instead?

What's wrong with a normal dependency?
Please don't abuse select, use it only if you really have to.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [2.6 patch] include/net/ieee80211.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
• Next by Date: Re: CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME woes
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]