On 8/21/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote: > Well it will survive all right, but eventually get into swap thrash territory > and that's not a meaningful cpu scheduler benchmark. > > Cheers, > Con > Ok. How about make -j? It's one of kernbench test runs, on my box load average > 1500 ;). BTW I have only 1 gb ram, so high values of -j are road to hell for my system... I'm still learning, but it's fun ;). Now I'll try your latest -ck. Thanks for "1Gb Low Memory Support". Regards, Michal Piotrowski - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
- From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
- Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
- References:
- [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
- From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
- Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
- From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
- Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
- From: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
- Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
- From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
- [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
- Prev by Date: 2.6.12.5: psmouse mouse detection doesn't work
- Next by Date: Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
- Previous by thread: Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
- Next by thread: Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
- Index(es):
