Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:44, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 8/21/05, Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well it will survive all right, but eventually get into swap thrash
> > territory and that's not a meaningful cpu scheduler benchmark.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Con
>
> Ok. How about make -j? It's one of kernbench test runs, on my box load
> average > 1500 ;).

Just do that if you wish to overload the system. It's a vm benchmark. No doubt 
the cpu scheduler contributes to how the vm behaves, but it isn't a primary 
cpu scheduler test.

> BTW I have only 1 gb ram, so high values of -j are road to hell for my
> system... I'm still learning, but it's fun ;). Now I'll try your latest
> -ck. Thanks for "1Gb Low Memory Support".

You're welcome,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux