Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6

On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:34, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,

Hi

> here are kernbench results:

Nice to see you using kernbench :)

> ./kernbench -M -o 128
> [..]
> Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:

Was there any reason you chose 128? Optimal usually works out automatically 
from kernbench to 4x number_cpus. If I recall correctly you have 4 cpus? Not 
sure what 128 represents. 

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
    • From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
    • From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>
  • Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
    • From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
• Next by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Problems with connect/disconnect cycles
• Previous by thread: Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
• Next by thread: Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]