Re: [PATCH/RFT 4/5] CLOCK-Pro page replacement

From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:05:32 -0700

> Perhaps by uprevving the compiler version?

Can't be, we definitely support gcc-2.95 and that compiler
definitely has the bug on sparc64.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH/RFT 4/5] CLOCK-Pro page replacement
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH/RFT 4/5] CLOCK-Pro page replacement
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH/RFT 4/5] CLOCK-Pro page replacement
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH/RFT 4/5] CLOCK-Pro page replacement
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] Add pci_walk_bus function to PCI core (nonrecursive)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/5] 2.6.13-rc5-mm1, driver for IBM Automatic Server Restart watchdog
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFT 4/5] CLOCK-Pro page replacement
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFT 4/5] CLOCK-Pro page replacement
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]