"David S. Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:38:18 -0700
>
> > I'm prety sure we fixed that somehow. But I forget how.
>
> I wish you could remember :-) I honestly don't think we did.
> The DEFINE_PER_CPU() definition still looks the same, and the
> way the .data.percpu section is layed out in the vmlinux.lds.S
> is still the same as well.
Argh, can't remember, can't find it with archive grep. I just have a
mental note that it got fixed somehow. Perhaps by uprevving the compiler
version? We certainly have a ton of uninitialised DEFINE_PER_CPUs in there
nowadays and people's kernels aren't crashing.
Rusty, do you recall if/how we fixed the
DEFINE_PER_CPU-needs-explicit-initialisation thing?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |