"David S. Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, evicted_pages);
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU() needs an explicit initializer to work
> around some bugs in gcc-2.95, wherein on some platforms
> if you let it end up as a BSS candidate it won't end up
> in the per-cpu section properly.
>
> I'm actually happy you made this mistake as it forced me
> to audit the whole current 2.6.x tree and there are few
> missing cases in there which I'll fix up and send to Linus.
I'm prety sure we fixed that somehow. But I forget how.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |