Chris Wright wrote:
* [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture
(mach-default).
I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in
my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings.
I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the
earlier set which added more reliance on mach-default?
Yes, I already sent the fix to Jeff and Andrew, so it may already
included in anything based off -mm1. But it seems a good idea in
general for UML. I got a 100% clean um-i386 build after this patch on
-rc5-mm1.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |