* [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
> Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture
> (mach-default).
>
> I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in
> my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings.
I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the
earlier set which added more reliance on mach-default?
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |