Re: [PATCH 1/6] i386 virtualization - Fix uml build

* [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
> Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture
> (mach-default).
> 
> I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in
> my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings.

I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the
earlier set which added more reliance on mach-default?

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/6] i386 virtualization - Fix uml build
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/6] i386 virtualization - Fix uml build
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] add Dell Systems Management Base Driver (dcdbas) with sysfs support
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/6] i386 virtualization - Remove some dead debugging code
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/6] i386 virtualization - Fix uml build
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/6] i386 virtualization - Fix uml build
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]