On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, [email protected] wrote:
> I guess I should do some profiling runs - I'm surprised there would be
> this much of a hit with the static slots.
Yes. It could be some cache effect, where the exact placement of the
SELinux pointer might be critical, and also vary depending on the hook and
subclass of SELinux security struct.
- James
--
James Morris
<[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |