Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots

On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 [email protected] wrote:

> The attached patch implements your idea on top of my previous patchset.
> Following is performance data on a 16-way ppc.  dbench and tbench were
> run 50 times, kernbench and reaim 10 times each;  results are mean +/-
> 95% confidence half-interval.  The 'static slot' kernel had a single
> static slot for selinux, plus the (unused in this case) shared struct
> hlist_head security.

Can you also compare with no stacker at all (i.e. just SELinux with caps 
as secondary module) ?


- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots
    • From: [email protected]

• References:
  • [patch 0/15] lsm stacking v0.3: intro
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [patch 0/15] lsm stacking v0.3: intro
    • From: James Morris <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/15] lsm stacking v0.3: intro
    • From: James Morris <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: assertion (cnt <= tp->packets_out) failed
• Next by Date: Re: [-mm patch] relayfs: add read() support
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]