Quoting James Morris ([email protected]):
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > those annoying cache effects, I assume - 3 slots (the default)
> > outperforms two slots, even though only one slot is being used. These
> > tests were run on a 16-way power4+ system. I may try to re-run on some
> > x86 hardware, though each run will probably take 24 hours.
>
> I've also run some benchmarks, comparing vanilla kernel with the
> two stacker approaches. Results below.
>
> Results seem to be mixed, sometimes a bit better, sometimes a bit worse.
> The macro benchmarks tend to show better figures for the static slot
> model.
>
> Overall, it seems that SELinux could expect to take a 1-2% performance hit
> with the stacker.
Thanks, James.
I guess I should do some profiling runs - I'm surprised there would be
this much of a hit with the static slots.
thanks,
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |