Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)

* Dominik Karall <[email protected]> wrote:

> BUG: mono[10011] exited with nonzero preempt_count 1!
> ---------------------------
> | preempt count: 00000001 ]
> | 1 level deep critical section nesting:
> ----------------------------------------
> .. [<ffffffff803f791e>] .... _spin_lock+0xe/0x70
> .....[<0000000000000000>] ..   ( <= 0x0)
> 
> If there is anything I should test, let me know!

please enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS!

we now know that it's a spin_lock reference that got leaked, but we dont 
(yet) know the parent.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
  - From: Dominik Karall <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [patch] preempt-trace.patch
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
  - From: Dominik Karall <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Is it a process?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 8/8] ALSA: convert kcalloc to kzalloc
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
Next by thread: Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]