Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)

Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 
> * Dominik Karall <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > BUG: mono[10011] exited with nonzero preempt_count 1!
> > ---------------------------
> > | preempt count: 00000001 ]
> > | 1 level deep critical section nesting:
> > ----------------------------------------
> > .. [<ffffffff803f791e>] .... _spin_lock+0xe/0x70
> > .....[<0000000000000000>] ..   ( <= 0x0)
> > 
> > If there is anything I should test, let me know!

Thanks, Dominik.

> please enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS!

Seems a bit tricky.  Wouldn't it be best if enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
autoselected CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL, CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER and whatever else
we need?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • [patch] preempt-trace.patch
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
    • From: Dominik Karall <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: mthca and LinuxBIOS
• Next by Date: fsnotify on removexattr
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]