On Friday 05 August 2005 17:22, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Dominik Karall <[email protected]> wrote: > > BUG: mono[10011] exited with nonzero preempt_count 1! > > --------------------------- > > > > | preempt count: 00000001 ] > > | 1 level deep critical section nesting: > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > .. [<ffffffff803f791e>] .... _spin_lock+0xe/0x70 > > .....[<0000000000000000>] .. ( <= 0x0) > > > > If there is anything I should test, let me know! > > please enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS! > > we now know that it's a spin_lock reference that got leaked, but we dont > (yet) know the parent. I'm sorry, but I think I can't enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS. Depends on: DEBUG_KERNEL && (X86 && !X86_64 || CRIS || M68K || M68KNOMMU || FRV || UML) Seems to be disabled for x86_64. dominik
Attachment:
pgpTvDgaS12qb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- References:
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- From: Dominik Karall <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- Prev by Date: sluggish/very slow usb mouse on hp nx6110 notebook
- Next by Date: Re: mthca and LinuxBIOS
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- Index(es):
