Dave Jones wrote: >On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 05:56:14PM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 4. August 2005 17:40 schrieb Dave Jones: > > >On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:38:30AM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > > > >+ ulFibreFrame = kmalloc((2048/4), GFP_KERNEL); > > > > > > > > The size bug was already found by Dave Jones. This never should be > > > > written this way (not your fault). The array should have been > > > > [2048/sizeof(ULONG)]. > > > > > >wasteful. We only ever use 2048 bytes of this array, so doubling > > >its size on 64bit is pointless, unless you make changes later on > > >in the driver. (Which I think don't make sense, as we just copy > > >32 64byte chunks). > > > > No, this is how it should have been before. This way it would have been > > clear where the magic 4 came from. > >It's pointless to fix this, without fixing also CpqTsGetSFQEntry() >... At least half of the file should be rewritten. > > >we're trashing the last 48 bytes of every copy we make. > > >Does this driver even work ? > > > > No, ulDestPtr ist ULONG* so we increase it by sizeof(ULONG)*16 which is > > 64. > >Duh, yes. That is broken on 64-bit however, where it will advance 128 bytes >instead of 64 bytes. ULONG is defined to __u32 in some of the cpq* headers. Eike
Attachment:
pgpCvyyhaoCu4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH 1/2] cpqfc: fix for "Using too much stach" in 2.6 kernel
- From: "Saripalli, Venkata Ramanamurthy (STSD)" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpqfc: fix for "Using too much stach" in 2.6 kernel
- From: Rolf Eike Beer <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpqfc: fix for "Using too much stach" in 2.6 kernel
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/2] cpqfc: fix for "Using too much stach" in 2.6 kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
- Next by Date: RE: IDE disk and HPA
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpqfc: fix for "Using too much stach" in 2.6 kernel
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpqfc: fix for "Using too much stach" in 2.6 kernel
- Index(es):