Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: Where is place of arch independed companion chips?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 11:13 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> 
>>>Good question.  I was about to submit a patch that created 
>>>drivers/platform because the toplevel driver for MQ11xx is a 
>>>platform_device driver.  Any thoughts on this?
>>
>>drivers/platform sounds good to me.
> 
> 
> In another thread (about the ucb1x00) we came up with the idea of
> drivers/mfd (mfd = multi function devices).
> 
> The core and platform specific parts would live here with suitable clear
> naming and the subsection specific parts that were separable would live
> in the appropriate place within the kernel.
> 
> Just another idea to add to the mix and removes the dilemma of a
> multifunction device with isn't platform based...
> 
drivers/mfd as drivers/mfd, I have not objections. Who will send the
patch first?

--
Regards
Andrey Volkov

P.S. Tony, Greg, may be it will someone from you? (I've in mind sn/ subdir)





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux