On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 15:04 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > > > > What's wrong with using jiffies?
> > > >
> > > > A lot of the (driver) users want a wallclock based timeout. For that,
> > > > miliseconds is a more obvious API with less chance to get the jiffies/HZ
> > > > conversion wrong by the driver writer.
> > >
> > > We have helper functions for that.
> >
> > I think we just disagree then... I consider this one a helper function
> > as well, one with a simpler API that wraps the more complex and powerful
> > api.
>
> How is it more powerful?
jiffies/HZ is the more powerful API. The msec one which also sets
current to (un)interruptible is the simplified wrapper on top.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch 1/4] drivers/char/ip2/i2lib.c: replace direct assignment with set_current_state()
- Re: [patch 1/4] drivers/char/ip2/i2lib.c: replace direct assignment with set_current_state()
- [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
- Re: [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
- Re: [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
- Re: [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
- Re: [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
- Re: [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
- Re: [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|