> How does something like this look? If this looks ok, I'll send out > bunches of patches to add users of the new interfaces. I'd drop the FASTCALL stuff... nowadays with regparm that's automatic and the cost of register-vs-stack isn't too big anyway Also I'd rather not add the non-msec ones... either you're raw and use HZ, or you are "cooked" and use the msec variant.. I dont' see the point of adding an "in the middle" one. (Yes this means that several users need to be transformed to msecs but... I consider that progress ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- [UPDATE PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}_msecs() interfaces
- From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
- References:
- [patch 1/4] drivers/char/ip2/i2lib.c: replace direct assignment with set_current_state()
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [patch 1/4] drivers/char/ip2/i2lib.c: replace direct assignment with set_current_state()
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
- From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[email protected]>
- [patch 1/4] drivers/char/ip2/i2lib.c: replace direct assignment with set_current_state()
- Prev by Date: Re: fix suspend/resume irq request free for yenta..
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.13-rc3: swsusp works (TP 600X)
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
- Next by thread: [UPDATE PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}_msecs() interfaces
- Index(es):
