Re: [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 05:04:57 -0600 (MDT)
> Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> >  void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> > +	printk("CPU %d:", smp_processor_id());
> 
> Isn't there a space after the : missing here?

I don't believe so, there is a \n in the first line of 
__show_regs

	Zwane

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs
    • From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs
    • From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: ATAPI+SATA support in 2.6.13-rc3
• Next by Date: FC3 module sys_print how...
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs
• Next by thread: [patch 07/12] dlm: better handling of first lock
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]