[PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Up to date i've been using the GS value to determine the processor number 
in dumps from show_regs, however this can be cumbersome to do if you don't 
have the vmlinux to verify with the address of cpu_pda, how about the 
following? I considered using hard_smp_processor_id for robustness but we 
already dereference current so we're already relying on MSR_GS_BASE being 
sane.

Signed-off-by: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>

Index: linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvsroot/linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -B -r1.1.1.1 process.c
--- linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c	10 Jul 2005 04:38:46 -0000	1.1.1.1
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c	15 Jul 2005 10:54:42 -0000
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs * regs)
 
 	printk("\n");
 	print_modules();
-	printk("Pid: %d, comm: %.20s %s %s\n", 
+	printk("CPU: %d Pid: %d, comm: %.20s %s %s\n", smp_processor_id(),
 	       current->pid, current->comm, print_tainted(), system_utsname.release);
 	printk("RIP: %04lx:[<%016lx>] ", regs->cs & 0xffff, regs->rip);
 	printk_address(regs->rip); 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux