Re: [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 05:04:57 -0600 (MDT)
Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]> wrote:


>  void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> +	printk("CPU %d:", smp_processor_id());

Isn't there a space after the : missing here?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs
  - From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs
  - From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs
  - From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: PS/2 Keyboard is dead after resume.
Next by Date: Re: ATAPI+SATA support in 2.6.13-rc3
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]