Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 13:30 -0700, randy_dunlap wrote:
> | Then the owners of such machines can use HZ=250 and leave the default
> | alone.  Why should everyone have to bear the cost?
> 
> indeed, why should everyone have to have 1000 timer interrupts per second?

So why waste everyone's time with CONFIG_HZ when there are working
dynamic tick solutions out there?  It's just bad release engineering.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux