Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

Lee Revell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  > This is not a userspace visible thing really with few exceptions, and
>  > well people can select the one they want, right?
> 
>  Then why not leave the default at 1000?

Because some machines exhibit appreciable latency in entering low power
state via ACPI, and 1000Hz reduces their battery life.  By about half,
iirc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Martin Schlemmer <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [2.6 patch] net/Kconfig: two ATM-related spelling fixes
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Apple USB Touchpad driver (new)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]