On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 14:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]> wrote: > > WHAT? > > > > The previous value here i386 is 1000 --- so why is the default 250. > > Because 1000 is too high. > What happened to 300 as default, as that is divisible by both 50 and 60 (or something like that) ? Wanted to remember somebody suggested rather using that ... Curiosity sake. Thanks, -- Martin Schlemmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
- Next by Date: Re: halt: init exits/panic
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Index(es):
