On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 14:41 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > Yes, that's called "progress" so no one complained. Going back is > called a "regression". People don't like those as much. Sorry for the tone of this message, I really sound like a jerk. Anyway, I've said all I have on this topic. I don't want a flame war over this. BTW, Christoph Lameter, if you're seeing this, your mail is bouncing... Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Martin Schlemmer <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Diego Calleja <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Index(es):
