Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

El Sat, 09 Jul 2005 14:16:31 -0400,
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> escribió:

> I still think you're absolutely insane to change the default in the
> middle of a stable kernel series.  People WILL complain about it.


Lots of people have switched from 2.4 to 2.6 (100 Hz to 1000 Hz) with no impact in
stability, AFAIK. (I only remember some weird warning about HZ with debian woody's
ps).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
  - From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
  - From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
  - From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
  - From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@nosferatu.za.org>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
  - From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]