El Sat, 09 Jul 2005 14:16:31 -0400, Lee Revell <[email protected]> escribió: > I still think you're absolutely insane to change the default in the > middle of a stable kernel series. People WILL complain about it. Lots of people have switched from 2.4 to 2.6 (100 Hz to 1000 Hz) with no impact in stability, AFAIK. (I only remember some weird warning about HZ with debian woody's ps). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Martin Schlemmer <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Index(es):
