On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 10:06 +1000, Grant Coady wrote: > I've not been able to get dual channel I/O speed faster than single > interface speed, either as 'md' RAID0 or simultaneous reading or > writing done the other day: > > Time to write or read 500MB file: > > >summary 2.4.31-hf1 2.6.12.2 > >boxen \ time -> w r w r > >--------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- > ... > >peetoo 33 20 26.5 22 > >(simultaneuous 57 37.5 52 38.5) > > MB/s 2.4.31-hf1 2.6.12.2 > w r w r > single 15 25 19 23 > dual 17.5 27 19 26 > > These timings show very little happening in parallel, is that normal? "me too" ;-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: André Tomt <andre@tomt.net>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- Prev by Date: Re: GIT tree broken? (rsync depreciated)
- Next by Date: Re: sent an invalid ICMP type 11, code 0 error to a broadcast: 0.0.0.0 on lo?
- Previous by thread: Re: [git patches] IDE update
- Next by thread: Re: [git patches] IDE update
- Index(es):
