On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:02 +0200, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > Ok, looks alright for both. Your machine is quite slow, perhaps that is
> > showing the slower performance. Can you try and make HZ 100 in 2.6 and
> > test again? 2.6.13-recent has it as a config option, otherwise edit
> > include/asm/param.h appropriately.
> >
>
> I forgot to write that my 2.6.12 kernel is already compiled with HZ 100
> (it makes the system more responsive).
> I've just tried 2.6.8.1 with HZ 1000 and there is no difference in HDD
> performance comparing to 2.6.12.
OK, interesting. You could try and boot with profile=2 and do
# readprofile -r
# dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=128k
# readprofile > prof_output
for each kernel and post it here, so we can see if anything sticks out.
--
Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |