Re: [git patches] IDE update

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:32:52 -0400, Mark Lord <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>hdparm can also use O_DIRECT for the -t timing test.

I've not been able to get dual channel I/O speed faster than single 
interface speed, either as 'md' RAID0 or simultaneous reading or 
writing done the other day:

Time to write or read 500MB file:

>summary		2.4.31-hf1	2.6.12.2
>boxen \ time ->	 w 	 r	 w	 r
>---------------	----	----	----	----
...
>peetoo			33	20	26.5	22
>(simultaneuous		57	37.5	52	38.5)

MB/s		2.4.31-hf1	2.6.12.2
		w	r	w	r
single		15	25	19	23
dual		17.5	27	19	26

These timings show very little happening in parallel, is that normal?

Thanks,
--Grant.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Erik Slagter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: André Tomt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Grant Coady <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-11 glitches
• Next by Date: Re: IBM HDAPS things are looking up (was: Re: [Hdaps-devel] Re: [ltp] IBM HDAPS Someone interested? (Accelerometer))
• Previous by thread: Re: [git patches] IDE update
• Next by thread: Re: [git patches] IDE update
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]