From: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:03:58 +0400
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:35:30PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > That's fine, what would be the most minimal implementation?
>
> #define pci_update_resource(dev, res, n) BUG()
>
> No, I'm serious - I don't believe that generic implementation of
> pcibios_resource_to_bus() in the proposed patch does the right thing
> on sparc64 anyway.
We really don't do power management on sparc64 at all currently,
besides cpufreq, so I guess this would be OK.
Do PCI devices ever come out of reset in a PM state, and thus
would execute John's new code as a side effect?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|