From: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:51:04 +0400 > Why not just implement sparc64 version of pci_update_resource elsewhere > (perhaps a dummy one, if you don't need PCI PM), rather than force the > rest of the world to duplicate the code? That's fine, what would be the most minimal implementation? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- From: "John W. Linville" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- From: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- Prev by Date: Re: IBM HDAPS things are looking up (was: Re: [Hdaps-devel] Re: [ltp] IBM HDAPS Someone interested? (Accelerometer))
- Next by Date: Unsolved ext3 errors (2.4.30)
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- Index(es):
