On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:35:30PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > That's fine, what would be the most minimal implementation? #define pci_update_resource(dev, res, n) BUG() No, I'm serious - I don't believe that generic implementation of pcibios_resource_to_bus() in the proposed patch does the right thing on sparc64 anyway. Ivan. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- From: "John W. Linville" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- From: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- Prev by Date: Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-45
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Support for new chip type
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars
- Index(es):
