Re: function ordering (was: Re: [RFC] exit_thread() speedups in x86 process.c)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:30:23PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > this way we don't need to put a lot of __slow's in the code *and* it's
> > > based on measurements not assumptions, and can be tuned for a specific
> > > situation in addition.
> > 
> > This is reminiscent of "fur", whose source Old SCO opened.
> > Google for SCO fur: amidst all the hits about "fur flying"
> > you might find something useful!
> 
> Was it?  I was at Scaldera back in the days when it was supposed to get
> opensourced, but AFAIK it never actually happened, everyone just talked
> about it.

Look like you're right.  Google shows me an announcement of intent,
and a man page, and an interesting gcc discussion; but no fur source.

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux