Re: function ordering (was: Re: [RFC] exit_thread() speedups in x86 process.c)

On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:30:23PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > this way we don't need to put a lot of __slow's in the code *and* it's
> > based on measurements not assumptions, and can be tuned for a specific
> > situation in addition.
> 
> This is reminiscent of "fur", whose source Old SCO opened.
> Google for SCO fur: amidst all the hits about "fur flying"
> you might find something useful!

Was it?  I was at Scaldera back in the days when it was supposed to get
opensourced, but AFAIK it never actually happened, everyone just talked
about it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: function ordering (was: Re: [RFC] exit_thread() speedups in x86 process.c)
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [RFC] exit_thread() speedups in x86 process.c
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] exit_thread() speedups in x86 process.c
    • From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>
  • function ordering (was: Re: [RFC] exit_thread() speedups in x86 process.c)
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: function ordering (was: Re: [RFC] exit_thread() speedups in x86 process.c)
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: reiser4 plugins
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Re: PATCH for ide_floppy
• Previous by thread: Re: function ordering (was: Re: [RFC] exit_thread() speedups in x86 process.c)
• Next by thread: Re: function ordering (was: Re: [RFC] exit_thread() speedups in x86 process.c)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]