On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:42:26PM +0200, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > > So, I'm kind of stuck with a very slow driver initialization. I think it > takes much longer than the 30 seconds visible in the logfile, at least > that's the impression I have (I'll use a stopwatch next time). The -rc6 aic7 driver needs just over 7 minutes to recover from this tape unit. In -rc3 this was 80 seconds. -rc2 had no problem. I don't really need this old tape unit and I don't [re-]boot that often so it is not a problem for me. Anyway, if something needs to be tested then mail me a patch (for stock rc6) and I'll try it. -- Frank - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- References:
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Gr�ire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Frank van Maarseveen <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Frank van Maarseveen <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Jazzsonic driver updates
- Next by Date: Re: .../asm-i386/bitops.h performance improvements
- Previous by thread: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Next by thread: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Index(es):