On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:39:27 +0200, Thomas Renninger said: > There are two ways C-state addresses are exported to OS. > > - Some flags in the FADT (-> ACPI spec) -> this gives you two C-states maximum, AFAIK. This must be what I have, because... > - Through the _CST function in your DSDT (-> ACPI spec, sorry). If you have > have a look in dsdt.dsl at the _CST function there are that much packages returned as > your BIOS claims to support. Hmm, _CST code is often in the SSDT an extention > of the DSDT code. If you have one: acpidmp > acpidmp; acpixtract ssdt acpidmp >my_ssdt; > iasl -d my_ssdt. I tried (using pmtools-20031210 and acpica-unix-20050513): acpidmp > c840.dmp acpixtract dsdt c840.dmp > c840.dsdt acpixtract ssdt c840.dmp > c840.ssdt iasl -d c840.dsdt iasl -d c840.ssdt No signs of a _CST in either the DSDT or SSDT (in fact, xtract ssdt got me a zero-length file, so I suspect there's no SSDT at all in there). Oh well.. looks like short of BIOS/DSDT hacking, I'm stuck. At least the dynamic tick code got some testing out of all this... ;)
Attachment:
pgpIXEfGCVQRT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- RE: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-1
- From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-1
- From: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: Thomas Renninger <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: Thomas Renninger <[email protected]>
- RE: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-1
- Prev by Date: Re: Race condition in module load causing undefined symbols
- Next by Date: Re: S3 test tool (was : Re: Bizarre oops after suspend to RAM (was: Re: [ACPI] Resume from Suspend to RAM))
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- Index(es):