On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:01:11 +0200, Thomas Renninger said: > > Should there be a C3/C4? Is my laptop just plain borked? :) > Depends on your machine and BIOS, whether it's supported -> seems as if it's not. > > You could verify by having a deeper look in your FADT/DSDT. > You need the acpi tools from Len Brown (acpidmp/acpixtract) and the iasl Intel ACPI > compiler. > AFAIK checking for C-support is rather robust in recent kernels as long as you don't have a broken > DSDT table. OK, found acpidmp and iasl, now have a decompiled DSDT - now to figure out if it's busticated or not.... :) > Maybe you find a newer BIOS supporting C3? Nope, I just checked, and the A13 BIOS from 02/06/2004 is the latest that Dell has released for the C840. Not much hope there unless there's some special secret site that even newer BIOS updates hide until they escape.. ;) > To be honest, I doubt you save much power even with dyn tick enabled if you only have support > for C1 and C2. The pmstats tool from Tony (see link above) > could tell you nicely whether you gain anything. Well, it's a start, anyhow. :)
Attachment:
pgphk9AZbIDLO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: Thomas Renninger <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- References:
- RE: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-1
- From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-1
- From: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: Thomas Renninger <[email protected]>
- RE: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-1
- Prev by Date: Re: network driver disabled interrupts in PREEMPT_RT
- Next by Date: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- Index(es):