On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:25:07 PDT, Tony Lindgren said: > You may also want to check out the patch by Thomas Renninger for ACPI > C-states. I've added a link to it at: > > http://muru.com/dyntick/ I think that's muru.com/linux/dyntick ? I'm not sure what Thomas's patch will do for me - here's what I currently have: % cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power active state: C2 max_cstate: C8 bus master activity: 00000000 states: C1: type[C1] promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[000] usage[00000010] *C2: type[C2] promotion[--] demotion[C1] latency[050] usage[01314979] Near as I can tell, we start off in C1, drop into C2, and stay there no matter what happens - we never move back up to C1, and there's no C3 to drop into.... Should there be a C3/C4? Is my laptop just plain borked? :)
Attachment:
pgplWVxb72NgE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: Thomas Renninger <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- References:
- RE: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-1
- From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-1
- From: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- From: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
- RE: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-1
- Prev by Date: Re: latency error (~2ms) with nanosleep
- Next by Date: Re: latency error (~2ms) with nanosleep
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
- Index(es):
 |