On Llu, 2005-06-13 at 14:50, Neil Horman wrote: > You mean add the ability to monitor directories for changes to the ptrace > interface entirely? If you are using it for debugging and tracking file accesses then ptrace seems to be the right interface. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
- References:
- [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
- From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
- From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
- From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
- From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
- [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
- Prev by Date: [RFC/PATCH -mm] execute in place: reduce code duplication
- Next by Date: Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
- Next by thread: Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
- Index(es):
 |