Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes

On Sul, 2005-06-12 at 19:10, Neil Horman wrote:
> How about this?  Its the same feature, with an added check in fcntl_dirnotify to
> ensure that only processes with CAP_SYS_ADMIN set can tell processes preforming

Once you are monitoring and sending signals I think its time to ask if
the interface is in totally the wrong place. Would it not be better if
it was part of the ptrace interface to the monitored process ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
    • From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
    • From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
    • From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
    • From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?
• Next by Date: Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]