On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 02:42:43PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sul, 2005-06-12 at 19:10, Neil Horman wrote:
> > How about this? Its the same feature, with an added check in fcntl_dirnotify to
> > ensure that only processes with CAP_SYS_ADMIN set can tell processes preforming
>
> Once you are monitoring and sending signals I think its time to ask if
> the interface is in totally the wrong place. Would it not be better if
> it was part of the ptrace interface to the monitored process ?
>
You mean add the ability to monitor directories for changes to the ptrace
interface entirely?
Regards
Neil
--
/***************************************************
*Neil Horman
*Software Engineer
*Red Hat, Inc.
*[email protected]
*gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
*http://pgp.mit.edu
***************************************************/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
