On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Yes, there are many places where 2.4 and 2.6 are not source compatible
> for good reasons. But if the effort for maintaining compatibility
> between 2.4 and 2.6 in one area is as easy as keeping a header file with
> some dummy funtions it's worth considering.
The devfs calls for 2.4 and 2.6 are totally incompatible. And there's
a trivial way to support both 2.4 and 2.6 in this area: don't support
devfs at all, it always was marked either experimental or deprecated
anyway.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
