Hi! > > I know of two others ... > > > > sym2 has: > > #define DMA_DAC_MASK 0x000000ffffffffffULL /* 40-bit */ > > > > and aic7xxx has: > > const uint64_t mask_39bit = 0x7FFFFFFFFFULL; > > > > Would you mind respinning your patch to include these? > > > > I'm grepping the drivers, and what a mess. This will be a nice cleanup. > > Why would someone use 0xFFFFffff? To make it easier to count Fs? Pavel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] cciss 2.6; replaces DMA masks with kernel defines
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH] cciss 2.6; replaces DMA masks with kernel defines
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- DMA mapping (was Re: [PATCH] cciss 2.6; replaces DMA masks with kernel defines)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: DMA mapping (was Re: [PATCH] cciss 2.6; replaces DMA masks with kernel defines)
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: DMA mapping (was Re: [PATCH] cciss 2.6; replaces DMA masks with kernel defines)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: DMA mapping (was Re: [PATCH] cciss 2.6; replaces DMA masks with kernel defines)
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: DMA mapping (was Re: [PATCH] cciss 2.6; replaces DMA masks with kernel defines)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] cciss 2.6; replaces DMA masks with kernel defines
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Patch series to remove devfs [00/22]
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Patch series to remove devfs [00/22]
- Previous by thread: Re: DMA mapping (was Re: [PATCH] cciss 2.6; replaces DMA masks with kernel defines)
- Next by thread: [PATCH 1/4] UML - Remove duplicate includes
- Index(es):
 |