On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 04:41:07PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Yes, there are many places where 2.4 and 2.6 are not source compatible
> > for good reasons. But if the effort for maintaining compatibility
> > between 2.4 and 2.6 in one area is as easy as keeping a header file with
> > some dummy funtions it's worth considering.
>
> The devfs calls for 2.4 and 2.6 are totally incompatible.
>...
OK, it seems I've missed how much devfs changed during 2.5 times...
Simply discard my emails in this thread.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
