On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Bill Huey wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:16:47PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Sounds like I need to add "antisocial hardware" to the list of > > things that need to be inspected to validate realtime latencies. > > And anti-social memory controllers (cough G5 Macs) What's wrong with the memory controller on the G5? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- References:
- Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Tim Bird <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] filesystem auditing by location+name
- Previous by thread: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Next by thread: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Index(es):
 |